Home | News | Google Wants Judge to Dismiss Four Charges in Oracle Suit

Google Wants Judge to Dismiss Four Charges in Oracle Suit

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font


Google is hoping to head off some of the complaints Oracle has made against it by asking a California judge for permission to file summary judgment on four issues.

Google's lawyers filed the requests, which cover an array of issues, late on Tuesday.

In one of the requests, Google asks the judge to rule that should Oracle win, it should only collect damages starting when it first gave notice to Google that it was infringing the patents, in July 2010. According to the so-called "marking statute," if proper licensees of the patents haven't indicated on their products that they are using the patents, a company cannot collect damages from an infringer until the company sends notification of the infringement.

At issue is whether Oracle has labeled any products in the market as being licensed to use the relevant patents. Google refers to an earlier Oracle document where Oracle admits that it isn't aware of any commercial products that are marked as using the patents. As such, Google argues it shouldn't be liable for damages until after July 2010, when Oracle notified it of the infringement. If the judge agrees, the potential damages Oracle could collect if it wins the suit would be significantly reduced.

In another request, Google would like to ask the judge to throw out the invalidity claims of one of the patents because it says that Sun broadened the patent's scope improperly. Google claims that Sun, which created Java and related patents that are now owned by Oracle, broadened the patent after a two-year limit during which applicants are allowed to broaden the scope of a patent.

 

SOURCE : PCWORLD.COM FOR MORE NEWS DETAILS Visit Pcworld.com

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (23 posted)

avatar
www.qualityhandbag.com 18/08/2015 12:32:00
Feature 3: Acceptable architect and acceptable seller. Some of them are smaller, some bigger, some of them are aphotic and some ablaze etc.
avatar
mulberry replica 16/12/2015 14:00:05
Good information, you shared such a interesting points.
avatar
replica handbags 18/08/2015 12:32:22
Among all the myths, this is the a lot of acclaimed and the a lot of apocryphal and appropriately charcoal as a myth.
avatar
Omega Replica Watches 27/05/2017 15:54:10
Google claims that Sun, which created Java and related patents that are now owned by Oracle, broadened the patent after a two-year limit during which applicants are allowed to broaden the scope of a patent.
avatar
replica handbags for sale 10/11/2015 06:03:01
Google's lawyers filed the requests, which cover an array of issues, late on Tuesday.
avatar
replica watches uk 17/12/2015 11:44:04
In another request, Google would like to ask the judge to throw out the invalidity claims of one
avatar
replica watches 17/12/2015 11:44:30
broadened the patent after a two-year limit during which applicants are allowed to broaden the scope of a patent.
avatar
Makalah 20/01/2016 23:48:05
And I thought I was the sensible one. Thanks for setting me sttgrahi.
avatar
Rowdy 21/01/2016 02:53:56
I cannot tell a lie, that really <a href="http://cvavbusfbaz.com">hepled.</a>
avatar
Roxanna 03/02/2016 11:58:29
It's about time soneome wrote about this. http://wavcwkue.com nuhvqksqv [link=http://snftmym.com]snftmym[/link]
avatar
rolex replica watches 21/03/2016 07:59:45
cheap rolex replica watches on sale
avatar
iwc replica watches 21/03/2016 08:00:13
iwc replica watches uk online shopping
1 2 3 next total: 21 | displaying: 1 - 10

Post your comment

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

No tags for this article

Rate this article

0